|
MDS Moore Diversified Services, Inc. Senior Living & Health Care Market Research/Strategic Planning
If You Need To Know The Senior Market You Need To Know MDS Consulting and Strategy Solutions A Two Generation Company - Serving Clients For Over 39 Years
|
|
|
Strategy of The Month for September 2009 COMMUNITIES ALSO AGE IN PLACE Product, Price, Value, & Services Are What Really Count While most of us are aware that our residents age in place, we frequently overlook or ignore another chronic aging trend - the gradual deterioration of our physical plants. As the senior living industry matures significant and innovative improvements are being made in the design and ambience of new senior living communities. This new trend is good, but it also represents a major challenge to older communities forced to compete with new, state-of-the-art projects. Strategic Focus Let’s sharpen our focus on this huge challenge by reviewing a “reality punch list.” Here are four very relevant issues and questions that must be consistently addressed:
Finally, are you charging Buick/Cadillac prices for a Chevrolet/Pontiac quality physical plant? Some feel compelled to do in order to pay their escalating expenses, sustain break-even cash flow, and avoid financial distress. Read on. Charging for Buicks But Delivering Chevrolets Your response to the inevitable aging of a community must focus on two important issues:
The two issues are very complex, and inevitably interrelated. Existing residents express reasonable levels of satisfaction and are frequently resistant to change. However, the future marketplace is heavily focused on five key attributes: product, price, value, choice, and services. Over the next five years, the status of many of the existing physical plant aging problems will evolve from serious to critical. Staff members will usually start to recognize subtle changes in the viability of their community. Long waiting lists become shorter, resulting in a smaller inventory of serious, qualified prospects. Stabilized occupancy begins to decline and marketing momentum eventually stalls.Basic Design Flaws Typical shortcomings in many older assisted living communities include: 1. Very small studio or alcove units 2. Not enough one bedroom units 3. Inadequate Pullman kitchens or no kitchens at all 4. Dated plumbing fixtures, lighting fixtures and cabinetry 5. Obvious wear and tear in public spaces, coupled with outdated interior designs 6. The community scores low on the ambiance scale Combined, these flaws result in negative value perceptions. Space is Always at a Premium In older communities, there is frequently inadequate space in community/common areas; space that is now desperately needed. Aging residents have more needs and staff frequently require more space to serve those needs. Dining areas are often small or lack ambiance. Some communities opened only self-service buffet lines, but with aging residents and competitive threats, full wait staff service and a menu offering multiple entrees is becoming imperative. Five Warning Signs There are five warning signs to look for which signal that some capital investment is necessary:
Top Five Areas for Potential Capital Improvements Just as there are five signals that it is time to consider capital improvements, there are five areas to consider in particular when planning these improvements:
Exploit Market Niche Opportunities Market niches should be carefully considered during a comprehensive renovation and/or expansion effort. This would include purpose-built applications such as special Alzheimer’s/dementia units, space for a home health agency or fresh approaches to rehabilitation and adult day care. Your Existing Residents May Deceive You Many sponsors judge the severity of their physical plant problems by monitoring the relative degree of existing resident satisfaction. This approach can be dangerously misleading, because the mindset of existing residents in these outdated facilities can represent a good news/bad news situation. The good news is that many existing residents living in sub-par living units (by today’s competitive standards) are generally quite content. Formal resident panels indicate a surprisingly high degree of resident satisfaction. While many residents are aware of – and have visited – the newer competitors, they still prefer their “home,” and are either willing to accept or are not sensitive to their sub-par conditions. Some residents are even paying premium prices for a community lacking ambience and modern amenities. The bad news is that the positive attitudes of such residents frequently mask the true reaction of the broader replacement market, which is the lifeblood of any senior living community. New prospects and their loved ones visiting these communities are generally much more critical in terms of their first impressions. They see an aging facility serving an older, frailer community of residents. This can represent an immediate turn-off. A Master Plan to Retrofit as Units are Vacated Many sponsors find that with these capital improvements, they must change their pricing and service delivery policies. Naturally they are concerned about how existing residents will react. But to defer such changes indefinitely is not viable. Retrofit by attrition – upgrading vacant units as residents move out – is an alternative strategy. The attrition strategy clears the way for reasonable changes in pricing and service delivery policies. The future viability of the community is gradually re-established. This approach involves a number of challenges. Still, it should prove very effective in the long-run. One of the most effective ways to gradually make changes on an existing campus is to have a master plan that addresses the total concept, but implements the necessary changes in phases. The plan could include a unit-by-unit upgrade as individual units become vacant. This approach minimizes the impact on existing residents, and even provides a rationale for a two-tiered pricing strategy as the newly enhanced, more state-of-the-art living units become available to future residents. Upgraded living units can also be offered to existing residents for a modest increase in monthly service fees. There are obviously serious financial implications to consider. Next month’s newsletter will show you how to compute a modest increase in a unit’s monthly service fee in order to break even on the capital cost of the improvementDon’t Procrastinate – The Time to Act is Now! Many owner/operators and boards of directors are reluctant to make relatively expensive, progressive capital improvement investments. Instead, they hope for a miracle – that the downward occupancy spiral will level off to a plateau of acceptable performance. The physical plant problem is not going away. Capital improvement efforts should be implemented as a consolidated, proactive strategic initiative. Capital improvements should not be a fragmented, reactive, Band-Aid approach. Remember, if the situation will gradually become critical in five years, now may be right time to start taking action.
| |||||
|
Moore Diversified Services, Inc. │ 3001 Halloran Street │ Fort Worth, Texas 76107 (817)731-4266 │ Fax (817)738-2031 E-Mail: MDSResearch@m-d-s.com
Web Address: www.m-d-s.com
Suggestions or Comments About This Website: webmaster@m-d-s.com All Material Copyright © 1998 - 2010 Moore Diversified Services, Inc.
|